Nov 23, 2021 Commissioners Court

ITEM 10, DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION 14, 2022,

[10. Discussion/Action to consider Resolution 14-2022, authorizing the County Judge to negotiate and execute renewal of the lease on 9675 State Highway 142 in Maxwell for Precinct 3 Justice of the Peace Building.]

AUTHORIZING COUNTY JUDGE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE RENEWAL OF LEASE ON 96 75 STATE HIGHWAY 142 IN MAXWELL FOR PRESSING THREE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE BUILDING.

COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS JUST WHAT IT SAYS.

IT'S TIME FOR US TO RENEW A LEASE ON THAT BUILDING.

THE OWNERS OF THE BUILDING WOULD LIKE TO RENEGOTIATE THE LEASE, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND READ THE RESOLUTION.

RESOLUTION 14 DASH 2022 RESOLUTION OF CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, WHEREAS KAHLO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT THE COUNTY, FINDS IT ISN'T THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF CALDWELL COUNTY THAT THE PRECINCT THREE JUSTICE COURT REMAIN AT 96, 75 STATE HIGHWAY AT MAXWELL, TEXAS.

THE PREMISES AND WHEREAS THE PREMISES IS OWNED BY THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM LLOYD SIMON, LESSOR, WHEREAS THE LESSOR AND THE COUNTY ON OCTOBER 10TH, 2008, PREVIOUSLY ENTERED INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT IN WHICH THE COUNTY LEASE THE PREMISES FROM THE LESSOR, WHEREAS THE LESSOR IN THE COUNTY ON OCTOBER 1ST, 2013, PREVIOUSLY ENTERED INTO THE LEASE.

RENEWAL AGREEMENTS THAT EXTENDED THE LEASE AGREEMENT TO NOVEMBER 30TH, 2018 AND WHEREAS THE LESSOR IN THE COUNTY ON NOVEMBER 13TH, 2018, PREVIOUSLY ENTERED INTO A LEASE RENEWAL AGREEMENT THAT ENDS ON NOVEMBER 30TH, 2021.

WHEREAS THE LESSOR AND THE COUNTY DESIRE TO

[00:15:03]

FURTHER EXTEND THE LEASE AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED [NOISE] BY THE CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT THAT THE COUNTY JUDGE IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE, EXECUTE RENEWAL OF THE LEASE OF 96, 75 STATE HIGHWAY 142 IN MAXWELL FOR PRECINCT 3 JUSTICE COURT ORDER THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021.

COMMISSIONERS, CAN I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 14 DASH 2022.

>> AWESOME.

>> THOSE HEARING NONE MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM 11, DISCUSSION ACTION.

[11. Discussion/Action to consider Resolution 15-2022, authorizing the County Judge to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Caldwell County and the City of Mustang Ridge for subdivision regulation within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Mustang Ridge.]

IT CONSIDERS RESOLUTION 15, DASH 2022 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY JUDGE EXECUTE AN INNER LOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CALDWELL COUNTY AND THE CITY OF MUSTANG RIDGE FIRST SUBDIVISION REGULATION WITH THE EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF MUSTANG RIDGE.

AGAIN, COMMISSIONERS, EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS IT IS.

WE NEED TO NEGOTIATE THIS AGREEMENT IN ORDER TO CLEARLY THE DEFINE THE ROADS OF THE COUNTY AND THE CITY, AND I'LL GO AHEAD AND READ THE RESOLUTION.

RESOLUTION 15 DASH 2022 RESOLUTION OF CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT.

WHEREAS THE COLLIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT IS ADOPTED AND IS ENFORCING SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO TAGS THE SLOPE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, SECTIONS 23, 2.001, 32, 32.005, AND OTHER STATUTES APPLICABLE TO COUNTIES AND WHEREAS THE STADIUM, MUSTANG RIDGE IS DALLY IDENTIFIED IT'S CORPORATE LIMITS IN THE AREAS OF ITS EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION, WITHIN THE COUNTY AND IS ADOPTED AND IT'S ENFORCING SUB-DIVISION AND REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AND WHEREAS CHAPTER 242 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AUTHORIZES A MUNICIPALITY THAT IDENTIFIES A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY AUTHORIZED TO REGULATE SUBDIVISION PLATS AND RELATED PERMITS IN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY, AND WHEREAS NO INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT EXISTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF MUSTANG RIDGE AND THE COUNTY RELATING, TO THE ALLEGATION OF OR EXERCISES OF SUBDIVISION REGULATION AUTHORITY.

WHEREAS COLLIN COUNTY AND THE CITY OF MUSTANG RIDGE DESIRE TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO REGULATE CLADDING AND RELATED PERMITS.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT THAT THE COUNTY JUDGE IS AUTHORIZED, EXECUTE THE INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CALWELL COUNTY AND THE CITY OF MUSTANG RIDGE FOR CELL DIVISION REGULATION WITHIN THE EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN MUSTANG RIDGE, OR THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 AND THE INNER LOCAL IS ATTACHED.

COMMISSIONERS ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 15, DASH 2022.

>> [INAUDIBLE]

>> OPPOSED HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM 12, DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER.

[12. Discussion/Action to consider Resolution 16-2022, approving an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Caldwell County and the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners for the Caldwell County District Attorney's Office joining of the Texas Veterinary Enforcement and Training Task Force, and authorizing the Caldwell County District Attorney to execute and manage the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement on behalf of the County.]

RESOLUTION 16, DASH 2022, PROVING AN INNER LOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN KAHLO COUNTY AND THE TEXAS STATE BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINERS, OF THE KAHLO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.

JOINING OF THE TEXAS VETERINARY ENFORCEMENT AND TRAINING TASK FORCE AND AUTHORIZING THE KAHLO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO EXECUTE AND MANAGE THE INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY.

RESOLUTION 16, 2022 RESOLUTION OF CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT, WHEREAS CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT FINDS IT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF THE COUNTY THAT THE CALDWELL COUNTY CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE JOINS THE TEXAS VETERINARY ENFORCEMENT AND TRAINING TASK FORCE BY EXECUTING AN INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH STATE BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINERS, WHEREAS THE CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT FINDS THAT THE CALDWELL COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT, CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHOULD BE DESIGNATED AS AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL TO MANAGE THE INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT.

THE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL IS GIVEN THE POWER TO ACCEPT, REJECT, ALTER, RENEW, OR TERMINATE THE INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT, THAT THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT APPROVES THE INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CALDWELL COUNTY CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE STATE BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINERS AND AUTHORIZES THE CALDWELL COUNTY CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO EXECUTE AND MANAGE THE INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021.

COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RESOLUTION? IF NOT, I'D LIKE FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 16-2022.

>> SO MOVE.

>> WE HAVE MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> I'LL SECOND.

>> OPPOSE, HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES.

[00:20:01]

>> AYE [OVERLAPPING]

ITEM 13, DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION 17-2022

[13. Discussion/Action to consider Resolution 17-2022, approving election services contracts between the Caldwell County Republican and Democratic Parties and the Elections Administrator to provide election services for upcoming primary elections and run-off elections, and directing the Elections Administrator to execute the same.]

APPROVING ELECTION SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN CALDWELL COUNTY REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PARTIES, AND THE ELECTION ADMINISTRATOR TO PROVIDE ELECTION SERVICES FOR UPCOMING PRIMARY ELECTIONS AND RUNOFF ELECTIONS, AND DIRECTING THE ELECTION ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE THE SAME.

>> GOOD MORNING.

>> HI, CAMBER.

>> HOW ARE YOU GUYS THIS MORNING?

>> GOOD.

>> HAPPY TURKEY WEEK.

>> THANK YOU.

>> WE'RE REQUESTING RESOLUTION 17-2022 TO AUTHORIZE ME TO SIGN THE CONTRACTS WITH BOTH THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PARTIES FOR THEIR PRIMARIES.

WOULD YOU LIKE FOR ME TO READ THE RESOLUTION?

>> YES, PLEASE. THAT'D BE GREAT.

>> WHEREAS CALDWELL COUNTY REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PARTIES ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE REPRESENTED RESPECTIVE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CHAIRS IN THE CALDWELL COUNTY ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR WISH TO CONTRACT FOR ELECTION SERVICES IN THE PARTIES' PRIMARY ELECTIONS, WHEREAS THE PARTIES REQUESTS THE CALDWELL COUNTY ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR TO CONTRACT WITH THE PARTY SHOULD PERFORM ELECTIONS SERVICES IN THE PARTIES' PRIMARY ELECTION ON MARCH 1, 2022, AND THE PARTIES RUN-OFF PRIMARY ELECTION, IF NECESSARY, ON MAY 24, 2022.

WHEREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 31.093 TEXAS ELECTION CODE, THE CALDWELL COUNTY ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATORS SHALL, AT THE REQUEST OF A PARTY, CONTRACT WITH A PARTY TO PERFORM ELECTION SERVICES IN THE PARTIES ELECTION AND RUNOFF ELECTION.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT THAT THE ELECTION SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CALDWELL COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY AND THE CALDWELL COUNTY ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR IS APPROVED.

TWO, THE ELECTION SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CALDWELL COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE CALDWELL COUNTY ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR IS APPROVED, AND THE CALDWELL COUNTY ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR IS DIRECTED TO EXECUTE THESE ELECTIONS SERVICES CONTRACTS.

ORDERED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021.

>> THANK YOU, CAMBER.

COMMISSIONERS, IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, I LOVE FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 17-2022.

>> I SO MOVE.

>> OPPOSE, HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES.

>> AYE [OVERLAPPING].

>> JUDGE, MAY I REQUEST THAT WE COULD MOVE TO 15? WE SKIP 14 GO TO 15 THAT'S ME, SO THAT I MAY GO BACK TO MY OFFICE AND DO REDISTRICTING.

>> ABSOLUTELY. ITEM 15,

[15. Discussion/Action to consider the outsource voter registration mass mail out to AMG Printing and Mailing.]

DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER THE OUTSOURCE VOTER REGISTRATION MASS MAIL OUT TO YOUR AMG PRINTING AND MAILING.

>> I DID A SURVEY IN DUE DILIGENCE ON THAT.

IT WILL SAVE THE COUNTY $1,600 ON POSTAGE AND $1,500 SAVINGS ON VOTER REGISTRATION CARDS.

TO OUTSOURCE THAT TO AMG PRINTING, THEY DO 187 OF OUR COUNTIES THAT ARE IN TEXAS NOW AND DO THEIR MASS MAIL-OUTS.

IT'S MUCH EASIER FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT.

WE JUST SEND THEM A LIST, AND THEY DO THAT MAIL-OUT, AND THEY DO IT AS BULK MAIL, SO IT SAVES US QUITE A BIT IN POSTAGE IN THE COST OF THE CARDS.

>> COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I'D LIKE FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 15 TO OUTSOURCE VOTER REGISTRATION MASS MAIL-OUT TO AMG PRINTING AND MAILING.

>> I SO MOVE.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND.

>> I'LL SECOND.

>> OPPOSE, HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> THANK YOU, CAMBER. ITEM 14, DISCUSSION ACTIONS.

[14. Discussion/Action to consider the Mental Health Jail-Based Services contract between Caldwell County and Bluebonnet Trails MHMR for Residential Substance Abuse Treatment services described in the Co-Morbidity Initiative Phase 4 grant awarded by the Criminal Justice Division of the Office of the Governor.]

YOU-ALL, WE'RE WAITING FOR ME TO SKIP THAT, WEREN'T YOU? [LAUGHTER] ITEM 14, DISCUSSION AND ACTION TO CONSIDER THE MENTAL HEALTH JAIL-BASED SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN CALDWELL COUNTY AND BLUEBONNET TRAILS MHMR FOR THE RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT SERVICES DESCRIBED IN THE CO-MORBIDITY INITIATIVE PHASE FOR GRANT AWARD BY CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR. DENNIS.

>> THANK YOU, JUDGE. GOOD MORNING, COMMISSIONERS.

AT THE FEBRUARY 9TH, 2021 COMMISSIONERS COURT MEETING THIS COURT-APPROVED RESOLUTION 12-2021 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR FOR A CO-MORBIDITY INITIATIVE PHASE FOR A GRANT.

A GRANT OF $89,410 WAS AWARDED AND HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THIS COURT.

YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU TODAY A PROPOSED CONTRACT BETWEEN CALDWELL COUNTY AND BLUEBONNET TRAILS MHMR FOR THE PROVISION OF THE RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TRAINING SERVICES THAT ARE DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT.

BLUEBONNET TRAILS HAS CONTRACTED WITH ACCOUNTING FOR MULTIPLE YEARS TO PROVIDE QUALIFIED MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND LICENSED PROFESSIONAL COUNSELORS PROVIDE THE REQUIRED MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR OUR INCARCERATED POPULATION.

THE CONTRACT YOU HAD BEFORE YOU COVERS OF A PERIOD OF NOVEMBER 1 OF 2021,

[00:25:02]

THROUGH JUNE 30TH OF 2022.

I SEEK YOUR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CONTRACT.

>> OKAY. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS FOR DENNIS? IF NOT, I'D LOOK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 14.

>> I SO MOVE.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE ITEM 14.

>> I'LL SECOND.

>> OPPOSE, HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU, DENNIS.

IS EVERYBODY HERE FOR ITEM 30? ARE YOU GUYS READY? OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO ITEM 30.

[30. Discussion/Action to consider a discussion for a presentation on Bollinger proposed subdivision and development agreement located on Sundance Court (FM 2720).]

IT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO BE A PRESENTATION ON THE [INAUDIBLE] PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LOCATED ON SUNDANCE COURT EPM 2720.

>> TRACY BRETON JUST HAD AN ASSOCIATES.

I'LL JUST MAKE A BRIEF INTRO, AND LET YOU ALL KNOW I'M HERE FOR QUESTIONS.

SCOTT MILLER WITH RANCHO DEVELOPMENT, THEY HAVE A PRESENTATION ON THIS PROJECT.

IT'S OFF OF 27, 20.

THEY'LL BE ASKING FOR A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

WE'VE HAD A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WITH COMMISSIONER TERRIO AND THE APPLICANT, ALSO EXCHANGED SEVERAL EARLY DRAFTS.

THEY WANT TO MAKE A QUICK PRESENTATION.

THE IDEA WOULD BE SIMILAR TO WHAT WE'VE BEEN DOING WITH OTHER [INAUDIBLE], MAKE WORKSHOP PRESENTATION, GETTING INITIAL FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT AND THEN WE'LL TAKE THAT INPUT AND WITH THE APPLICANT, COMMISSIONER TERRIO NEGOTIATE THE DETAILS OF THE-

>> HEY TRACY, IS YOUR MIC ON?

>> I DON'T KNOW. IS IT?

>> YES.

>> I'M TOO TALL. [LAUGHTER] I'M HERE.

I'M USUALLY LOUD ENOUGH WITHOUT THE MICROPHONE.

WITH THE INPUT FROM THE WORKSHOP SESSION TODAY AND COMMISSIONER TERRIO AND THE APPLICANT WILL GO NEGOTIATE THE DETAILS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND BRING IT BACK FOR THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT FINAL APPROVAL AND RATIFICATION.

HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AFTER THEIR PRESENTATION.

>> SCOTT IS EVEN TALLER THAN YOU ARE [INAUDIBLE] HERE.

>> HEY, SCOTT MILLER, RANCHO DEVELOPMENT.

JUST LOOKING FOR FEEDBACK.

IT'S A WORKSHOP PROCESS.

WE'VE GOT THIS IS 332 ACRES RIGHT AT THE CURVE ON 27 20.

[NOISE] IT'S COMPRISED OF TWO PARCELS.

THERE'S A PLUM CREEK CONSERVATION DISTRICT POND AND DAM ON THE PROPERTY.

WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT AND HOW WE'RE INCORPORATING THAT INTO THE LAND PLAN.

AS WE KNOW, THERE'S A LOT OF ACTIVITY THAT'S PROPOSED RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET IN SOME OF THE WALTON PROPERTY THAT EXTENDS ALL THE WAY TO 27 20.

HONESTLY, THE PLAN WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT WAS DEVELOPED PRIOR TO A LOT OF THAT COMING TO FRUITION.

WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT FLEXIBILITY AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF WHAT COULD HAPPEN ACROSS THE STREET AND HOW WE'RE DOING OUR LAND PLANNING.

BEAR WITH ME THIS IS NOT MY COMPUTER.

HERE'S A CONCEPT LAND PLAN, PRETTY CONCEPTUAL RIGHT NOW.

THIS IS PLANNED AS A PURELY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION.

YOU CAN SEE WE'VE GOT A LOT OF DRAINAGE AND FLOODPLAIN COMING THROUGH THE PROJECT.

WE WANTED TO INCORPORATE THAT IN.

IT'S A GREAT PIECE OF PROPERTY.

IT'S GOT MORE TOPO THAN WE WOULD NORMALLY SEE OUT IN CALDWELL COUNTY.

I THINK THE THOUGHT WHEN WE FIRST STARTED PLANNING THIS WAS GIVE IT A LITTLE BIT ABOUT A TEXAS HILL FLAVOR AND TRY TO BRING SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT MORE COHESIVE IN TERMS OF A MASTER PLAN AND MAYBE THAN WHAT'S HAS BEEN DONE OUT THERE PREVIOUSLY.

IT'S A CHANCE, I THINK BRINGING AN UPSCALE PROJECT TO THIS AREA.

AS YOU GUYS MAY OR MAY NOT KNOW, WE'VE GOT FOUR PROJECTS IN NEWLIN AND THE BAR HAS BEEN RAISED IN NEWLIN AS AS PRICING.

NEWLIN'S ONLY TWO MILES AWAY.

WE CAN SEE WHERE THE MARKET IS GOING AND IT'S CHANGING RAPIDLY.

I THINK FROM A MARKET PERSPECTIVE, IT'S GOING TO BE IN HIGH DEMAND FROM BUILDERS AND HOME BUYERS.

IF WE START AT THE ENTRY, YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE CONSTRAINTS AT THE ENTRY IS WE DON'T HAVE A TON OF FRONTAGE ALONG 27, 20.

WE'VE GOT THIS FAIRLY SIGNIFICANT FCRA OVERHEAD EASEMENT AND THEN A SAWS WATER LINE CROSSING THROUGH THE PROPERTY.

WE'RE STARTING OFF AT 27, 20 WITH THIS DIVIDED BOULEVARD CONCEPT WHERE WE SHOVE THAT MORE TO THE EAST TO TRY TO PULL IT AWAY FROM THE POWER LINES BECAUSE IT'S PRETTY IMPACTFUL.

WE'VE GOT A DIVIDED BOULEVARD, WHICH DOES TWO THINGS.

ONE, IT REALLY PROVIDES A REALLY NICE SENSE OF ENTRY INTO THE COMMUNITY, AND IT ALSO PROVIDES US TWO SEPARATE TRAVEL LANES.

AS WE TALK ABOUT EMERGENCY VEHICLE AXIS,

[00:30:01]

WHICH WE'LL TALK ABOUT A LITTLE BIT LATER.

IT PROVIDES US MAYBE TWO ALTERNATIVES.

IF SOMETHING WERE TO HAPPEN AT THE ENTRY WHERE WE HAVE TWO WAYS OUT OR INTO THE PROJECT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES.

CURRENTLY, WE'RE PROPOSING A TOWN-HOME PRODUCTS, SOME ATTACHED FOR SALE PRODUCT UP AT THE ENTRY.

SOUNDS CRAZY. TRYING TO BRING SOME AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO THIS AREA OF TOWN.

JUST BECAUSE WE'RE PRICINGS GONE.

AS WE COME INTO THE PROJECT, YOU SEE WE'VE GOT THIS NICE CURVE ON THE BOULEVARD AS IT SNAKES THROUGH THE COMMUNITY.

THEN WE START TO DECREASE THE DENSITY, INCREASING THE SIZE OF THE PRODUCTS.

WE GO INTO 40-FOOT LOTS, 54- FOOT LOTS AND ULTIMATELY WE'RE PROGRAMMING SOME 64 LOTS.

WE MAY ACTUALLY PUSH UP TO SOME 80-FOOT LOTS DEPENDING ON WHERE THE MARKET GOES.

WE'LL WANT TO HAVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WORDED SUCH THAT WE HAVE THAT FLEXIBILITY.

CURRENTLY, WE HAVE BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE AMENITIES PLAN.

WE'VE GOT TWO SIGNIFICANT NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS PLAN THAT WOULD BE PUBLIC OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOA, BUT FOR PUBLIC USE, WE DO THAT THROUGH AN AXIS.

THEN WE HAVE A PRIVATE FACILITY WHICH IS YOUR TYPICAL FOOL RESTROOM, MORE OF A GATED JUST FOR RESIDENTS [NOISE] ONLY.

REGARDING THE ENTRY AREA, CURRENTLY, WE'VE GOT TOWN-HOMES PROGRAMS. I THINK WHAT WE'D LIKE TO DO IS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, GO WITH MORE OF A MIXED-USE DESIGNATION, WHICH WOULD ALLOW US TO DEPENDING ON WHAT HAPPENS IN THIS SURROUNDING AREA PIVOT TO MAYBE EVEN SOME LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, SOME RETAIL, MAYBE SOME HIGHER DENSITIES, SOME FOR RENT PRODUCT, WHICH WOULD ALL FIT, WHAT COULD HAPPEN AS THAT AREA HAS BEEN.

I THINK WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CRAFT THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LANGUAGE WITH ENOUGH FLEXIBILITY TO CHANGE THOSE LAND USES, THE BACK OF THE PROJECT WOULD STILL REMAIN A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT.

ONE OF THE MAIN ISSUES THAT WE ARE WORKING ON RIGHT NOW, MEETING WITH MR. TERRIO WAS THE SECONDARY AXIS SPECIFICALLY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN.

AS YOU COULD SEE, WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF FRONTAGE ON 27, 28 AS YOU GET INTO THE BACK OF THE PROJECT, WE'RE REALLY CUT OFF FLOODPLAIN AND NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.

WE WILL HAVE THAT RESOLVED BY THE TIME WE COME BACK NEXT YEAR WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TERMS OF WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO WITH EMERGENCY EXIT.

WE'LL BE WORKING WITH TRACY OVER TO TRY TO FIGURE THAT OUT.

WE'VE GOT A COUPLE OF OPTIONS THAT WE'RE WORKING OUT TO GET THAT AXIS, BUT WE KNOW HOW CRITICAL IT IS.

WE ARE PRESERVING THE FLOODPLAIN AREA AND YOU CAN SEE THAT DRAINAGE COME THROUGH THE PLUM CREEK CONSERVATION POD.

THERE'S A DAM THAT'S HARD TO SEE.

TRACY DOES THIS HAVE A POINTER? THE DAM IS-

>> IT'S IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT IN THE GREEN SPACE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PROJECT.

>> WE'VE GOT THAT CONSTRAINT.

WE'RE WORKING AROUND.

THE OTHER ISSUE THAT CAME UP WITH OUR PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING WAS DOING A DAM BREAKAGE ANALYSIS.

MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING IN DOWNSTREAM OF THE DAM IS DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE A DAM BREAKAGE.

WE WILL GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS WITH THE COUNTY AS WELL.

WE WILL MOST LIKELY UTILIZE PART FOR THIS PROJECT.

WE HAVE SOME PRETTY EXTENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURE, BOTH WATER, AND WASTEWATER THAT WILL HAVE TO BE INSTALLING.

WE'LL BE LOOKING TO GET A MUD THROUGH TCQ.

THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT IN A NUTSHELL, JUST LOOKING FOR SOME FEEDBACK AND DIRECTION.

>> OKAY. COMMISSIONERS, ANY COMMENTS?

>> HAVE YOU STARTED THE MUD PROCESS AT ALL?

>> WE'RE JUST KICKING IT OFF NOW.

THAT WE'LL START THAT IN EARLIEST ABOUT THE TIME WE COME BACK TO DO WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

>> ARE YOU LOOKING AT A LOCAL APPROVAL PROCESS OR ARE YOU GOING TO GO TO THE LEGISLATURE?

>> TCQ.

>> THAT PCC DECIDES IT'S ON THERE.

IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME CORRECTLY, THAT ONE CURRENTLY DOES NOT HAVE AN IMPOUNDMENT ALL YEAR ROUND, DOES IT? IT'S DRY AND IT'S ONLY DURING FLOOD CAPACITY.

ARE THEY ALL GOING TO PURSUE THAT TO HAVE IT NOT BE THE CASE?

>> [LAUGHTER] NO. RIGHT NOW THAT SITS IN AN UPLAND AREA IF YOU'RE ASKING ABOUT THE TENSION AND DRAINAGE.

>> THERE'S A VERY FEW THOSE THAT DON'T HOLD ANY WATER AND I KNEW THAT THAT SIDE WAS ONE OF THE ONES THAT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO.

>> [INAUDIBLE] DANIEL.

>> DANIEL BIO.

[00:35:01]

>> [INAUDIBLE]

>> COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION TODAY.

SCOTT. WE APPRECIATE IT.

>> THANK YOU.

>> WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE BACK TO ITEM 16.

[16. Discussion/Action to consider the increase in pledged securities, amendment No. 3 to depository contract.]

DISCUSSION IN ACTION TO CONSIDER INCREASE AND PLEDGE SECURITIES, AMENDMENT NUMBER 3 TO DEPOSITORY CONTRACT.

COMMISSIONERS, I DO WANT TO DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO ONE THING.

IF YOU LOOK ON YOUR BACKUP DOWN AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE PAGE WHERE THE WRITING IS IN BOLD, IT SAYS 10 MILLION THERE, THAT SHOULD BE CORRECTED TO 13 MILLION.

SAYS ANY REQUESTS INCREASE IN PLEDGING MUST BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY THE COUNTY AND THE BANK.

CURRENTLY, THE BANK PLEDGES WHAT IS NECESSARY TO COVER THE COUNTY IN CSCDS DEPOSITS WITH MAXIMUM MAP AGREED UPON.

IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT THAT WILL BE PLEDGED, AND THIS SHOULD READ 13.5 MILLION AND ENOUGH PLEDGING WILL BE IN PLACE TO COVER BALANCES AS NEEDED UP TO MAXIMUM NOTED ABOVE, NO CHANGES ANTICIPATED IN THE PROCESS.

SIGNATURES ARE RESPECTIVE PARTIES ON PAGE 2, ANGELA?

>> YES, JUDGE. IT RECENTLY BECAME NECESSARY TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF OUR PLEDGE SECURITIES [NOISE] IN ORDER TO SAFE KEEP THE COUNTIES ADDITIONAL CASH ASSETS THAT HAVE COME IN RECENTLY.

THEREFORE, THIS AMENDMENT IS REQUIRED TO SHOW THAT WE HAVE INCREASED OUR PLEDGE SECURITIES TO COVER OUR ASSETS, AND THAT DOES REQUIRE THAT THE COURT APPROVE IT, AND IT DOES REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT TO OUR DEPOSITORY CONTRACT.

WE WILL HAVE THE CORRECTED COPY TO SHOW THAT THE AGGREGATE TOTAL IS 13.5 MILLION TO SIGN TODAY.

>> COMMISSIONERS, IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS? NO. I'D LIKE FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 16.

WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND.

ITEM 17, DISCUSSION IN ACTION TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENT NUMBER 10,

[17. Discussion/Action to consider the approval of Budget Amendment #10 moving money within Department 6610 (IT) as approved in 11/08/2021 Executive Session.]

MOVING MONEY WITHIN DEPARTMENT 66,10 IT AS APPROVED AND 118, 2021 EXECUTIVE SESSION.

LOOKS LIKE WE'LL BE MOVING MONEY FROM 00160000950 INSURANCE PROCEEDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,550 TO 0016523510 LOOMING AMEX IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,550.

THAT'S NOT IT. HERE WE GO.

[LAUGHTER] SORRY, I READ THE WRONG ONE.

I SKIPPED A PAGE.

THIS ONE, BEAR WITH US.

WE'RE MOVING $72,100 FROM 00166101020 IT MANAGER TO 00166101040 IT TECH, $55,000 AND THEN 00166101105, PAYROLL ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENTS, $6,681 001 6610210, SOCIAL SECURITY FICA ADJUSTMENT $930 00166102030 ADJUSTMENT OF $843, AND 001661040185, MOVIE NIGHT PLACING $19,554.

I THINK I GOT THAT RIGHT.

COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT TEAM? WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> AYE. OPPOSED HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM 18 DISCUSSION IN ACTION TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENT 11,

[18. Discussion/Action to consider the approval of Budget Amendment #11 to transfer money from (001- 6000-0950) Insurance Proceedings to (001-6520-3510) Luling Annex from damages to JP Pet. 2 Building.]

TO TRANSFER MONEY FROM 00160000950 INSURANCE PROCEEDS TO 00165203510 LOOMING AMEX FOR DAMAGES TO THE JP BUILDING.

WE HAD A CAR THAT STRUCK THE JP BUILDING AND CAVED IN THE WALL.

THIS IS TO REPAIR THAT DAMAGE,

[00:40:03]

AND SINCE I'VE ALREADY READ THAT DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

>> SO MOVE.

>> DO WE HAVE A MOTION? DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> SECOND,.

>> OPPOSED HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM 19, DISCUSSION IN ACTION TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENT 12.

[19. Discussion/Action to consider the approval of Budget Amendment #12 to transfer money from (001-6510-4860) Contingency to (001-6650-5310) Machinery and Equipment for Emergency Management Trailer.]

TRANSFER MONEY FROM 00165104860 CONTINGENCY TO 00165505310, MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT FOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TRAILER.

COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET A BRAND NEW EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TRAILER.

I THINK IT'S FROM BEAR COUNTY.

IT HAS GREAT SHAPE.

IT'S MUCH BETTER THAN THE ONE WE HAVE.

WE'RE GOING TO BE ENTERING AN AGREEMENT.

WE HAVEN'T ALREADY.

I BELIEVE WITH BEAR COUNTY TO SELL OUR CURRENT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TRAILER TO THEM TO OFFSET THIS TRANSFER FUNDS FROM CONTINGENCY.

IT'S A NET-ZERO COST.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? AMOUNT OF THE TRAILER IS 15,000.

IF NOT ABOUT FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT 12.

[BACKGROUND] I CAN.

WE'RE GOING TO LOSE 00165104860,15000 - 00165505310,15,000.

>> MOTION TO APPROVE.

>> SOME OF.

>> DO WE HAVE A MOTION? DO WE HAVE A SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

>> OPPOSED HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM 20, DISCUSSION IN ACTION TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENT 13 TO TRANSFER

[20. Discussion/Action to consider the approval of Budget Amendment #13 to transfer appropriate funds into the proper account for the American Rescue Plan Fund/ 019 Fund.]

APPROPRIATE FUNDS AND HAVE THE PROPER COUNT FOR THE AMERICAN RISKY PLAN FUND 19.

HERE WE GO. [LAUGHTER] WE ARE MOVING MONEY FROM 01910004050, COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION.

IS THAT CORRECT?

>> YES, SIR. MAY I?

>> YES, PLEASE.

>> OKAY. WHAT WE'RE DOING IS THEY WERE ACTUALLY APPROPRIATED, BUT NOW WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE APPROPRIATING THOSE INTO THE CORRECT ACCOUNTS.

>> OKAY.

>> WE ARE TAKING THAT $3,990,610 AND WE'RE APPROPRIATING FROM COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION ONLY LEAVING $250,000 IN THAT ACCOUNT, AND SO 019105165 WILL NOW HAVE $243,750 AND 0191051166 ODYSSEY , WILL HAVE $1,319,740.

0191051 167 UNIT ROAD EQUIPMENT WILL NOW HAVE 950,000 DESIGNATED TO IT.

0191051168 MAXWELL'S SGD 50,000, AND 01914,854 FOR VETERANS ASSISTANT 100,000, AND 019150 169 BROADBAND 1,327,120, AND THAT IS RECOMMENDED BY THE COUNTY JUDGE.

>> IT WAS JUST THE WAY IT WAS PRESENTED THERE IT THROUGH ME. THANK YOU.

>> YES, SIR.

>> COMMISSIONERS, IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS.

I'D LOOK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT 13.

WE HAVE A MOTION, DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

>> AYE [OVERLAPPING]

ITEM 21, DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A BUDGET AMENDMENT 14 FOR CALDWELL COUNTY EVACUATION CENTER.

[21. Discussion/Action to consider the approval of Budget Amendment #14 for Caldwell County Evacuation Center.]

WE'RE GOING, SAME THING.

WE'RE MOVING MONEY FROM 020, 3000, 1040, AND 17,636,400, 202010105123 CDBG MIT ACQUISITION 2 MILLION, 0210105124 CDBG MIT ADMIN LANGFORD, 1,276,400.

0210105125 CDBG MIT CONSTRUCTION 12,200,000.

02010105126 CDBG MIT ENGINEERING DUAL SET 2,130,000,

[00:45:03]

02010105127, CDBG, MIT ENVIRONMENTAL 30,000.

COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?

>> NO, JUDGE, I THINK I'LL ABSTAIN.

>> YES, SIR. I UNDERSTAND.

IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, I WOULD LOOK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT NUMBER 14.

WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT 14.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> I HAVE FOUR AYES AND ONE ABSTENTION BY COMMISSIONER, TERIO. MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM 22, DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER

[22. Discussion/Action to consider Unit Road PO #REQ01219 for Williamson County Equipment Co., Inc.]

UNIT ROAD PO NUMBER REQUISITION 01219 FOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $284,145. DANNY.

>> HERE WE GO. GOOD MORNING, JUDGE AND COMMISSIONERS.

THIS ONE IS FOR THE AMERICAN RESCUE FUNDS AND JUST GETTING THE APPROVAL SINCE IT'S OVER THE 50 THOUSAND AND TO GO AHEAD AND INITIATE OR GET THE APPROVAL ON THAT REQUISITION TO GENERATE IT INTO A PURCHASE ORDER.

>> COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION?

>> I'M SORRY, THESE ARE FURTHER TRACTORS FOR UNIT ROAD.

>> OKAY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO PRE-REQUISITION 01219?

>> MOVE.

WE HAD A FEW FOR YOU, DON'T DANNY?

I'M GOING TO SEE.

>> I'M SORRY?

>> DO WE HAVE A FEW FOR YOU COMING UP HERE?

>> YES. 22 THROUGH 29.

>> WE'LL GO THROUGH THESE REAL QUICKLY.

>> YEAH, THEY SHOULDN'T TAKE TOO LONG.

>> DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF PAYMENT FOR UNIT ROAD

[23. Discussion/Action to consider of approval of payment for Unit Road PO #REQ01219 for Williamson County Equipment Co. Inc.]

PO REQUISITION 01219 FOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY?

>> YES. AGAIN, THIS IS FOR THE ACTUAL PAYMENT WHEN THEY SEND ME THE INVOICE.

THE REASON I PUT IT ON HERE IS BECAUSE WE DO HAVE SUCH A LONG GAP BETWEEN NOW AND THE NEXT COMMISSIONER'S COURT.

SINCE I GOT THE APPROVAL ON THE PO WHEN THEY SEND ME THAT INVOICE I CAN GET WITH CARRIE AND GO AHEAD AND JUST CUT THAT CHECK OUT OF A REGULAR PAY CYCLE.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVED PO REQUISITION 01219.

>> SIR, MOVE.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION, DO WE HAVE A SECOND? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

ITEM 24 TO CONSIDER REQUISITION 01343 IN THE AMOUNT

[24. Discussion/Action to consider REQ01343 in the amount of $117,720.00 for IT services FY 21-22 to be generated into a blanket PO.]

OF $117,720 FOR IT SERVICES FY 21, 22, TO BE GENERATED INTO A BLANKET P0 IN THE AMOUNT OF $117,720?

>> YES, AND THIS IS FOR [INAUDIBLE] SERVICES TO DO IT RIGHT NOW.

THE [INAUDIBLE] INVOICES US ON A MONTHLY BASIS, SO IT'S JUST BENEFICIAL FOR MY OFFICE AND AS WELL AS THE AUDITOR'S OFFICE TO GO AHEAD AND HAVE A BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER FOR THOSE MONTHLY INVOICES AND GO AHEAD AND ENCUMBER IT.

>> OKAY. COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A MOTION TO CONSIDER REQUISITION 01340 TO APPROVE IT.

[BACKGROUND] WE HAVE A MOTION DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

ITEM 25 DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER NON-COMPLIANT OFFICE DEPOT PO INVOICE NUMBER 203814682001, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,799 FROM THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE?

[25. Discussion/Action to consider the Non-Compliant Office Depot invoice #203814682001 in the amount of $2,799.90 for the Sheriffs Office.]

>> YES. I'LL MAKE THIS QUICK.

THERE WAS AN INVOICE FROM OFFICE DEPOT THAT CAME THROUGH OUR OFFICE AN AMOUNT OF $2,799.90 FOR MULTIPLE ITEMS WHEN THE INVOICE APPEARED IN THE OFFICE DEPOT STATEMENTS TO BE PAID ON 11, 23.

THIS EXPENSE DID NOT HAVE A PURCHASE ORDER THAT IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALDWELL COUNTY PURCHASING POLICY, A SINGLE INVOICE ITEM, $500 OR MORE REQUIRES A REQUISITION TO BE GENERATED FROM DEPARTMENT HEAD DESIGNEE OR PURCHASING DEPARTMENT, AND THEN A PURCHASE ORDER TO BE ISSUED BY THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO MAKING PURCHASE OR SECURING THE SERVICES.

IN ORDER TO FINALIZE THE CLOSER ON THIS NON-COMPLIANCE ISSUE, THIS MUST BE MADE AWARE TO COMMISSIONERS COURT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IF ANY FURTHER ACTIONS ARE REQUIRED.

>> COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE NON-COMPLIANT OFFICE DEPOT INVOICE NUMBER 20381468001,

[00:50:04]

IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,799.

>> THIS HAS BEEN MADE AWARE TO THE PERSON THAT DIDN'T MAKE THE PURCHASE, SO IN THE END THEIR SUPERVISORS KNOW AS WELL.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

>> MOVE.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION, DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

ITEM 26, DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER THE NON-COMPLIANT OFFICE DEPOT INVOICE NUMBER 208609726001, IN THE AMOUNT OF $577.67 FOR THE JAIL? YES. AGAIN, I'M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH THE COORDINATES AND POLICY.

[26. Discussion/Action to consider the Non-Compliant Office Depot invoice #208609726001 in the amount of $577.67 for the Jail.]

I'VE READ THAT A GAZILLION TIMES.

THERE WAS A PURCHASE MADE BY THE JAIL IN THE AMOUNT OF $577.67.

THAT PERSON IS AWARE, OF COURSE, THEIR SUPERVISORS ARE TOO.

THIS IS JUST FOLLOWING PROTOCOL AND TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU GUYS ARE AWARE OF THAT PURCHASE.

>> COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE MOTION TO APPROVE A NON-COMPLIANT OFFICE DEPOT INVOICE, 208609726001 AMOUNT OF $577.67? [BACKGROUND] WE HAVE A MOTION, DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> WE HAVE MOTION AND SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE

ITEM; 27 DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER THE SUPPLEMENTAL WORK AUTHORIZATION AGREEMENT FOR CABELL COUNTY SH 142 ENGINEERING SERVICE PROJECT.

[27. Discussion/Action to consider the supplemental work Authorization Agreement for the Caldwell County SH 142 Engineer Service Project.]

THAT COST $499,462.80

>> YES. THIS IS JUST A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE STATE HIGHWAY 142 PROJECT TO REFLECT THE LATEST WORK-SHARING AGREEMENT FOR THE WESTERN CABELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION STUDY.

THE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WOULD RESULT IN A SLIGHT REDUCTION IN THE WORK AUTHORIZATION AMOUNT AND WOULD ALLOW AMERICAN STRUCTURE POINT TO OBTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVAL FOR BOTH PROJECTS, DEVELOP A PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY 142 SCHEMATICS AND PREPARE FUTURE FUNDING APPLICATIONS FOR CABELL COUNTY.

I BELIEVE SEAN IS HERE AS WELL IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

>> COMMISSIONERS.

>> GOOD MORNING, JUDGE, COMMISSIONERS.

AS WE DISCUSSED AND HAVE COORDINATED WITH THE WESTERN CABELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION STUDY, THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WILL JUST GET OUR SERVICES MORE IN LINE WITH WHAT CABELL AND THAT TEAM IS PROVIDING.

JUST AS MISS BLAKE SAID, THAT WOULD TAKE US THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVAL, BUT WOULD ALSO ALLOW AMERICAN STRUCTURE POINT IN OUR TEAM TO FURTHER A LOT OF THE CABELL APPLICATIONS IN FUNDING APPLICATIONS THAT WE ANTICIPATE WILL TAKE PLACE NEXT YEAR DURING THE CABELL CALL.

>> COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? [BACKGROUND] IF NOT, I'D LIKE FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE SUPPLEMENTAL WORK AUTHORIZATION AGREEMENT FOR THE CABELL COUNTY SH 142 ENGINEERING SERVICE PROJECT.

DO WE HAVE A MOTION, DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

ITEM 28; DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL TO PAY ENTERPRISE INVOICE NUMBER 2686 AND THE AMOUNT OF $39,722.27

[28. Discussion/Action to consider approval to pay Enterprise Invoice No. 2686 in the amount of $39,722.27.]

>> YES. AGAIN, THIS WAS MY FAULT.

I MISSED THE CUTOFF FOR ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND I DIDN'T WANT THIS TO GO UNPAID UNTIL DECEMBER 14TH.

I WENT AHEAD AND JUST GOT THIS ON THE AGENDA.

I BELIEVE BARBARA'S TEAM HAS ALREADY LOOKED IT OVER AND SAID IT WAS GOOD TO GO AS LONG AS IT GETS APPROVAL THROUGH COURT.

>> COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 28? [BACKGROUND] WE HAVE A MOTION AND WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> AYE. [BACKGROUND]

ITEM 29; DISCUSSION AND ACTION TO CONSIDER APPROVAL TO PAY

[29. Discussion/Action to consider approval to pay First Net Invoice in the amount of $12,524.20.]

FIRST NET INVOICE IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,524.20.

>> YES. THIS IS FOR THE ALL THE NEW HOT SPOTS FOR THE COUNTY.

AGAIN, SAME SCENARIO.

BUT THAT LAST TIME I HAD THAT PACKET, I LEFT IT WITH YOU, JUDGE.

ONCE YOU'VE TAKEN A LOOK AT IT OR ONCE IT GETS TO COURT AND THEN GETS YOUR SIGNATURE ON IT, THEN I'LL SEND IT UP TO BARBARA'S TEAM FOR AUDITING.

>> VERY GOOD. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? NOW LOOK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PAYMENT OF FIRST NET INVOICE IN THE AMOUNT $12,524.20.

[OVERLAPPING] WE HAVE A MOTION.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

[00:55:01]

>> OPPOSED HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 30.

>>AYE. [OVERLAPPING]

>> THANK YOU.

[31. Discussion/Action to consider approving an Order authorizing the filing of a Final Plat (Short Form Procedure) for Sagada Dos Subdivision located on Homannville Road.]

>> THANK YOU, NATTIE. ITEM 31; DISCUSSION ACTION TO CONSIDER APPROVING AND ORDER AUTHORIZING FILING OF FINAL PLAT SHORT FORM PROCEDURE FOR SUGATA; THOSE SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON [INAUDIBLE] ROAD.

>> GOOD MORNING. THIS IS JUST A QUICK SHORT-FORM PLAD, IT IS A FOUR-LOT SUBDIVISION.

[NOISE] THREE OF THE TRACKS ARE SMALLER TRACKS AND THE FOURTH WILL BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED.

IF YOU CAN SEE ALL THE ATTACHMENTS ARE INCLUDED. TRACEY IS STILL HERE.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLUS SIDE, WE HAD THE DEVELOPER HERE AS WELL.

I'M JUST LOOKING FOR A RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.

>> COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? NOW LOOK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 31.

>> I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 31.