[00:00:01]
>> GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE. THANK YOU FOR COMING
[A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER]
TO CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT THIS MORNING.WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER TUESDAY, APRIL 23RD, 2024 AT 9:00 AM.
COMMISSIONER THOMAS, WOULD YOU DO THE HONORS ON THE INVOCATION?
>> GOOD, GRACIOUS, HOLY, AND HEAVENLY FATHER, WE COME THIS MOMENT [INAUDIBLE] TO GOD.
AS WE GATHER AND LEGISLATE THE WAY YOU HAVE US GOD, WE ASK THAT ALL THE THINGS BE DONE DECENTLY AND IN ORDER.
ALL THESE THINGS WE ASK IN YOUR PRECIOUS NAME. AMEN.
>> DO WE HAVE ANY CITIZENS ANNOUNCEMENTS? COMMISSIONER.
[D. ANNOUNCEMENTS]
>> ANY STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS? YEAH. ONE. OKAY.
>> AMANDA MONTGOMERY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
MORNING, JUDGE, COMMISSIONERS.
I JUST WANT TO TAKE A BRIEF MINUTE TO INTRODUCE OUR NEWEST MEMBER.
THIS IS JOSE ANTHONY CASTILLO.
WE AFFECTIONATELY CALL HIM TONY II SINCE WE ALREADY HAVE A TONY I. TONY'S COMING FROM US FROM THE CITY OF MCALLEN.
HE IS A LICENSED CODE ENFORCER.
>> 15TH, BILINGUAL, HE IS VERY FAMILIAR WITH CITY ENFORCEMENT, AND WE'RE GOING TO GET HIM UP TO SPEED ON COUNTY ENFORCEMENT AND WHAT HE CAN AND CAN'T DO.
HOPEFULLY, NOW THAT WE HAVE A LICENSED CODE ENFORCER, WE CAN GET ROCKING AND ROLLING.
>> ANY OTHER STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS? IF NOT, WE'LL MOVE TO CITIZENS' COMMENTS.
>> WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GO TO CONSENT.
[F. CONSENT AGENDA]
COMMISSIONERS, IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS ON CONSENT, I'D LOOK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE.>> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT BY COMMISSIONER HORNE. SECOND?
>> BY COMMISSIONER WESTMORELAND.
ANY DISCUSSION? NOT. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED? HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES.
WE'LL GO TO DISCUSSION ACTION ITEMS.
[G.1 Regarding the burn ban.]
ITEM G1, DISCUSSION ACTION REGARDING THE BURN BAN.>> GOOD MORNING, JUDGE, COMMISSIONERS, STAFF, AND GALLERY.
TO JUST GIVE YOU A BRIEF UPDATE.
THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS, WE ONLY HAD ONE FIRE.
IT WAS DUE TO A RESIDENT THAT DECIDED TO LIGHT A BUNCH OF OLD WOOD THAT THEY HAD OUT IN FRONT AND CAUGHT THEIR TREES ON FIRE, BUT WE PUT THE FIRE OUT AND IT WAS UNDER CONTROL.
FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS, WE'RE SEEING A LOT OF RAIN ON AND OFF, INTERMITTENT.
THE ONLY DAY WE'RE GOING TO HAVE NO RAIN IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE SATURDAY.
THAT LOOKS PRETTY GOOD FOR IT.
FARMERS AND LANDOWNERS, IF YOU WANT TO BURN, BURN NOW WHILE YOU CAN, WHILE IT'S NICE AND WET AND THE GRASSES ARE GREEN SO YOU DON'T CATCH ANYTHING ON FIRE, BUT MAKE SURE YOU CONTACT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND LET THEM KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO BURN.
CURRENTLY, THE KBDI NUMBERS, THE MINIMUM IS 80, THE MAX IS 382, AVERAGE 184 WITH A CHANGE OF PLUS FOUR.
RECOMMENDING TO COMMISSIONERS COURT WE KEEP BURN BAN OFF ANOTHER TWO WEEKS.
>> COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A MOTION TO KEEP THE BURN BAN OFF.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER THOMAS. SECOND?
ANY DISCUSSION? NOT. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED. HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES.
ITEM G2, DISCUSSION ACTION TO APPROVE AN ORDER
[G.2 To approve an Order authorizing the sale of fireworks from May 22, 2024, through May 27, 2024, for Memorial Day.]
AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF FIREWORKS FROM MAY 22ND, 2024 THROUGH MAY 27TH, 2024 FOR MEMORIAL DAY.WHEREAS THE COMMISSIONERS COURT CALDWELL COUNTY IS AUTHORIZED UNDER OCCUPATIONS CODE, SECTION 2154.202(H) TO ISSUE AN ORDER ALLOWING RETAIL FIREWORK PERMIT HOLDERS TO SELL FIREWORKS TO THE PUBLIC IN CELEBRATION OF MEMORIAL DAY AND WHEREAS ON THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2024, THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY HAS DETERMINED THAT CONDITIONS ARE FAVORABLE TO ISSUE SUCH AN ORDER.
[00:05:01]
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY ADOPTS THIS ORDER AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF FIREWORKS TO THE PUBLIC BY RETAIL FIREWORKS PERMIT HOLDERS DURING MEMORIAL DAY PERIOD FROM MAY 22ND, 2024 AND ENDING AT MIDNIGHT MAY 27TH, 2024, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS.THIS ORDER EXPIRES ON THE DATE THE TEXAS A&M FOREST SERVICE DETERMINES DROUGHT CONDITIONS EXIST IN THE COUNTY OR MIDNIGHT, MAY 27TH, 2024, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER.
B, THE SALE OF RESTRICTIVE FIREWORKS AS DEFINED BY SECTION 352.051 TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, INCLUDING SKYROCKETS AND STICKS AND MISSILES WITH FINS IS PROHIBITED.
APPROVED THIS DAY, APRIL 23RD, 2024 BY CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT.
COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ORDER?
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WESTMORELAND.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER THERIOT.
ANY DISCUSSION? NOT. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED? HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES.
[G.3 To approve a Proclamation designating April 28 - May 5, 2024, as Caldwell-Travis Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) Stewardship Week.]
DISCUSSION ACTION TO APPROVE PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 28TH THROUGH MAY 5TH, 2024 AS CALDWELL-TRAVIS SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT STEWARDSHIP WEEK.>> GOOD MORNING. I'M DONALD GRAHAM [INAUDIBLE] WITH TRAVIS-CALDWELL SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
WITH ME THIS MORNING, I HAVE RODNEY PURSWELL BOARD MEMBER, ASHLEY MASSEY IS OUR TECH, KATHY HUTTO IS A BOARD MEMBER.
WE WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO READ OUR PROCLAMATION.
>> ALL RIGHT. I'LL BE HAPPY TO.
>> THANK YOU. PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING MAY 6TH THROUGH 10TH, 2024 AS THE AIR QUALITY.
OOPS, THAT'S THE WRONG PROCLAMATION.
WHERE IS MY? LET ME FIND IT HERE. JUST A MOMENT.
THIS WILL BE FUN BECAUSE IT'S TINY, SO BEAR WITH ME.
SOIL AND WATER STEWARDSHIP WEEK PROCLAMATION.
WHEREAS FERTILE SOIL AND CLEAN WATER PROVIDE US WITH OUR DAILY SUSTENANCE AND WHEREAS EFFECTIVE CONSERVATION PRACTICES HAVE HELPED PROVIDE US A RICH STANDARD OF LIVING AND WHEREAS OUR SECURITY DEPENDS ON HEALTHY SOIL AND CLEAN WATER, AND WHEREAS STEWARDSHIP CALLS FOR EACH PERSON TO HELP CONSERVE THESE PRECIOUS RESOURCES.
THEREFORE, I DO HEREBY PROCLAIM THE WEEK OF APRIL 28 THROUGH MAY 5, 2024 AS TEXAS SOIL AND WATER STEWARDSHIP WEEK.
COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PROCLAMATION.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HORN, DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER THOMAS.
ANY DISCUSSION. I'D JUST LIKE TO SAY WE APPRECIATE WHAT Y'ALL DO. IT'S IMPORTANT.
I KNOW AS A RANCHER HERE IN THE COUNTY AND I THINK SEVERAL OF US HAVE AGRICULTURAL ENDEAVORS AND WE APPRECIATE BEING ABLE TO PILE ON ALL WHEN WE NEED TO.
>> OPPOSED HERE AND NO MOTION CARRIES.
[G.4 To approve a Proclamation designating May 6 - 10, 2024, as Air Quality Awareness Week.]
DISCUSSION ACTION TO APPROVE THE PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MAY 6TH THROUGH 10 AS AIR QUALITY AWARENESS WEEK.>> I HAD A FEELING THAT WAS COMING, SO [LAUGHTER].
>> WHAT'S THAT? PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING MAY 6 THROUGH TENTH, 2024 AS AIR QUALITY AWARENESS WEEK.
WHEREAS AIR QUALITY CAN THREATEN OUR ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY, AND THE HEALTH OF THE RESIDENTS OF CALDWELL COUNTY AND WHEREAS CHILDREN, OLDER ADULTS, PEOPLE WITH LUNG DISEASE, AND PEOPLE WITH HEART DISEASE ARE PARTICULARLY AFFECTED BY POOR AIR QUALITY, WHICH MAKES UP ABOUT HALF OF ALL RESIDENTS IN CENTRAL TEXAS.
WHEREAS IN 2023, AIR QUALITY IN THE AUSTIN ROUND ROCK SAN MARCUS METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA, MSA WAS MODERATED OR WORSE, ACCORDING TO THE AIR QUALITY INDEX, AQI, MORE THAN 50% OF DAYS.
WHEREAS IN 2023, THE AUSTIN-ROUND ROCK SAN WHEREAS MARCUS METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA, MSA EXCEEDED THE FEDERAL EIGHT HOUR OZONE STANDARD, WHICH INCREASES THE REGION'S RISK OF BEING DESIGNATED NON ATTAINMENT.
WHEREAS THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
[00:10:03]
EPA REVISED THE ANNUAL FINE PARTICULATE MATTER PM 2.5 OF NACS TO NINE MICROGRAMS/CUBIC METER, WHICH TRAVIS COUNTY IS CURRENTLY EXCEEDING AND HAS EXCEEDED OVER THE PAST TWO DECADES.WHEREAS REMAINING IN COMPLIANCE WITH NACS IS IMPORTANT NOT ONLY FOR PUBLIC HEALTH, BUT ALSO FOR THE REGION'S ECONOMY AND ABILITY TO CONDUCT TRANSPORTATION PLANNING.
WHEREAS THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HAS DESIGNATED MAY 6TH THROUGH 10TH, 2024 AS NATIONAL AIR QUALITY AWARENESS WEEK, AND WHEREAS CALDWELL COUNTY SUPPORTS THE EFFORTS OF THE CENTRAL TEXAS CLEAN AIR COALITION AND THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY TO PROMOTE AIR QUALITY.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT THAT MAY 6 THROUGH 10TH, 2024 IS RECOGNIZED AS AIR QUALITY AWARENESS WEEK IN CALDWELL COUNTY, AND ENCOURAGES RESIDENTS AND EMPLOYEES TO TAKE ACTION TO BE AIR AWARE AND EDUCATE THEMSELVES ABOUT LOCAL AIR QUALITY BY VISITING CAPCOG'S AIR CENTRAL TEXAS WEBSITE AND AIR CENTRAL TEXAS.ORG BY PROMOTING AIR QUALITY AND AIR QUALITY AWARENESS WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY.
>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MAY 6TH THROUGH 10TH, 2024 AS AIR QUALITY AWARENESS WEEK.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WESTMORELAND TO APPROVE, DO YOU HAVE A SECOND?
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HORN, ANY DISCUSSION? NOT ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES.
ITEM G5, DISCUSSION ACTION TO REAPPOINT SALLY DANIEL AND
[G.5 To reappoint Sally Daniel and Alicia Thornton to the Caldwell County Community Services Foundation Board.]
ALICIA THORNTON TO THE CALDWELL COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION BOARD.COMMISSIONERS, WE'VE HAD THESE FOLKS ON STAGGERED TERMS, AND SO EVERY EVERY YEAR A COUPLE OF THESE BOARD MEMBERS COME UP TO BE EITHER REAPPOINTED OR REPLACED BY SOMEONE ELSE IF THAT'S THE PLEASURE OF THE COMMISSIONER OR MYSELF, IF IT'S MINE.
SALLY DANIEL WAS MINE AND I'M HAPPY TO HAVE HER BACK, AND I THINK COMMISSIONER THOMAS LIKED TO SPEAK TO HIS APPOINTMENTS.
>> SO MOVE, JUDGE, I WOULD LIKE TO REAPPOINT MISS STEPHANIE CARTER FOR MY APPOINTMENT.
>> COMMISSIONER THOMAS HAS MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE SALLY DANIEL AND STEPHANIE CARTER TO THE CALDWELL COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION BOARD. IS THERE A SECOND?
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HORN, ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES.
ITEM G6 TO ACCEPT THE 2025 BUDGET CALENDAR.
[G.6 To accept the 2025 Budget Calendar.]
COMMISSIONER, DO YOU HAVE IT IN YOUR PACKET? THAT'S THE CALENDAR THAT WE GO BY WHEN WE'RE DOING BUDGET MEETINGS, AND WE HAVE TWO WORKSHOPS SCHEDULED.LIKELY THERE WILL BE MORE THAN THAT.
BECAUSE THIS BUDGET SESSION IS GOING TO BE A LITTLE MORE INVOLVED THAN THEY NORMALLY ARE JUST DUE TO WHAT WE ARE FORECASTING TO BE A TYPE OF REVENUE YEAR.
WE MAY BE SURPRISED, BUT WE'RE FORECASTING AND IT'S GOING TO BE TIED.
>> I DID PUT ON THERE ON 14TH OF MAY TO HAVE A BUDGET WORKSHOP WITH YOU AS A COURT TO DECIDE, THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU WANT TO DO THIS YEAR, WHAT WILL BE AVAILABLE IN THE BUDGETS ANOTHER THING.
BUT JUST FOR YOU GUYS TO THINK OUT LOUD, I DON'T KNOW IF ANY OF THE OTHER ELECTED OFFICIALS OR DEPARTMENT HEADS HAVE REACHED OUT TO YOU WITH THEIR NEEDS OR WANTS FOR THIS NEXT YEAR.
THIS GIVE US A BRAINSTORMING SESSION.
FOR INSTANCE, IF ALL FOR YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT IS EVERY ONE OF YOU MENTIONED IT.
OBVIOUSLY, WE'VE GOT TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO GET THAT IN THE BUDGET.
YOU'RE GOING TO VOTE ON THE BUDGET.
OBVIOUSLY, YOUR PRIORITIES HAVE TO BE MY PRIORITY WHEN I'M FIGURING IT OUT.
WE'LL COME TO YOU IN AUGUST AND SAY, HERE'S THE BUDGET.
HAVE WE MISSED ANYTHING? DO YOU HAVE PRIORITIES IN HERE THAT WE DON'T HAVE ADDRESSED AND WE'LL GO THROUGH THAT AT THAT WORKSHOP.
THE OTHER WORKSHOPS ARE REALLY THE SAME THING.
WE'LL GO THROUGH AND LOOK AT THE BUDGET, REVIEW THEM.
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT WE'RE DOING WITHIN THE BUDGET, BE IT SALARIES OR WHATEVER IT IS, INSURANCE.
THEN WE'LL ADDRESS THOSE AT THAT TIME DURING THE WORKSHOP.
[00:15:02]
OUR PRELIMINARY BUDGET IS DUE AT THE END OF JULY.I CAN'T REMEMBER THE EXACT DATE, BUT BASICALLY THE END OF JULY.
IT IS JUST PRELIMINARY, GIVES EVERYBODY A CHANCE TO LOOK AT IT AND THEN WE'LL DO ALL PRIORITIES AND THEN WE'LL MODIFY IT, HOWEVER IT NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED.
GO BACK THROUGH IT AND BRING IT BACK TO YOU IN SEPTEMBER AFTER MULTIPLE WORKSHOPS TO APPROVE OUR BUDGET.
WE CAN DO IT AS EARLY AS 1ST OF SEPTEMBER, IF YOU GUYS ARE SATISFIED WITH IT, OR IT CAN GO TO THE LAST MEETING.
BUT AT THAT LAST MEETING IN SEPTEMBER, WE HAVE TO APPROVE IT.
IT MIGHT BE A SHORT ONE OR LONG ONE DEPENDING ON WHERE WE'RE AT.
[LAUGHTER] LET'S SEE HOW IT GOES.
BUT ANYWAY, I'D LOOK FOR A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE 2025 BUDGET CALENDAR IF YOU GUYS ARE SATISFIED WITH IT.
>> ON 14TH MAY, WILL THE WORKSHOP BE BEFORE OR AFTER OUR REGULAR AGENDA?
>> HOPEFULLY, DURING THE REGULAR AGENDA, WE'LL GET SOME DIRECTION ON ON WHERE WE'RE AT.
>> YEAH. I MAY WAIT UNTIL THE WORKSHOP AND BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT'S FOR.
>> NO IF WE HAVE A DISCUSSION ITEM ON THE AGENDA TO TALK ABOUT STAFFING STRUCTURE AND STUFF LIKE THAT.
BUT MORE THAN LIKELY IT WON'T BE, WE'LL JUST HAVE IT ON THE WORKSHOP TO GO THROUGH IT.
>> NEVER MIND. I THINK MY MAIN QUESTION WAS THE WORKSHOP BEING AFTER.
>> IT'S AFTER. IF THERE'S SOMETHING ON THERE THAT STAFFING RELATED ON THE 14TH AND WE'LL DEAL WITH THAT ISSUE ON THE AGENDA ITEM AND THEN WE'LL GO TO THE WORKSHOP.
FIGURE OUT HOW TO PAY FOR IT. WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO.
>> THEN IF I CAN JUST ADD ON, IF THERE'S SOMETHING IN PARTICULAR THAT THE COURT WOULD LIKE TO SEE AT THAT BUDGET WORKSHOP, I CAN PREPARE THAT AND BRING THAT.
>> IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT YOU WANT ON THAT FIRST ONE, THEN PLEASE REACH OUT, LET US KNOW BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO MAKE SOME FORECASTS, BUT I DON'T KNOW ANY OTHER WAY TO PUT IT, BUT THEY'RE A SHOT IN THE DARK BASED ON LAST YEAR AND WE'RE GUESSING AT HOW MUCH APPRAISAL VALUES ARE GOING TO GO UP.
WE WON'T KNOW THEN, WHICH AS YOU ALL KNOW DICTATES WHERE THE RATES GOING TO END UP AND DICTATES HOW MUCH REVENUE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE.
WE'RE GOING TO MAKE OUR BEST GUESS.
I'M BEING TOLD THAT PROPERTY VALUES AREN'T GOING TO GO UP TO THE LEVEL THAT THEY'VE GONE UP THE LAST FEW YEARS, WHICH MEANS THE RATE WON'T DROP AS MUCH, SO WE MAY HAVE FINALLY STABILIZED.
AS FAR AS OUR REVENUE GOES, I SURE HOPE SO, BUT WE WON'T KNOW.
WE WON'T EVEN KNOW BY MAY 14TH, SO WE'LL DO OUR BEST TO MAKE A GOOD GUESS AT IT.
IF THERE'S NO MORE QUESTIONS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE 2025 BUDGET CALENDAR?
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WESTMORELAND TO ACCEPT.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TERRIO.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NOT ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED, HEARING NONE MOTION CARRIES.
ITEM G7, DISCUSSION ACTION TO APPROVE
[G.7 To approve Granicus 3-year renewal contract for CaptionLive Basic captioning of Commissioners Court.]
GRANICUS THREE YEAR RENEWAL CONTRACT FOR CAPTION LIVE BASIC CAPTIONING OF COMMISSIONERS COURT.AS YOU WANT TO READ THAT, THE AMOUNT HAS CHANGED A LITTLE, LIKE IT DID LAST YEAR.
>> THAT'S JUST A LITTLE BIT, YES.
WELL, WE USED TO GET BILLED FOR ALL THE STREAMING SERVICES, BUT GRANICUS BOUGHT OUT SWAGIT SO WE DO LIVE CAPTIONING.
ONCE OUR STREAMING ENDS, THEY'LL CAPTION EVERYTHING FOR US.
THIS IS NOW THEY'VE DECIDED TO BILL US SEPARATELY.
THIS IS THE CONTRACT FOR THIS YEAR.
WE DO HAVE THE MONEY FOR IT, SO WE BUDGETED ACCORDINGLY, AND JUST NEED YOUR APPROVAL TO RENEW THE CONTRACT.
>> COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE GRANICUS THREE YEAR RENEWAL.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HORN. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER THOMAS.
ANY DISCUSSION? NOT. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES.
ITEM G EIGHT DISCUSSION ACTION AND APPROVED FINAL DRAFT AND SOLICITATION OF
[G.8 To approve final draft and solicitation of RFP 24CCP02P Uniform Rental and Laundering Services.]
RFP 24 CCP 02P UNIFORM RENTAL AND LAUNDERING SERVICES. CAROLYN.>> YES. OUR UNIT ROAD DEPARTMENT IS COMING TO THE END OF
[00:20:02]
THEIR CURRENT CONTRACT FOR SERVICES FOR A UNIFORM LAUNDERING AND RENTALS.WE JUST WANTED TO GO AHEAD AND GET THIS PROPOSAL OUT SO THAT WE CAN GET SOME VENDORS IN, TAKE A LOOK, AND GET A NEW CONTRACT SIGNED BEFORE THE CURRENT ONE ENDS.
>> OKAY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL, FINAL DRAFT OF SOLICITATION RFP 24 CCP O2P.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER THOMAS. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
>> A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HORN.
>> ARE WE TAKING THIS OUT FOR BID OR WE'RE JUST USING THE SAME COMPANY?
>> YES. ESSENTIALLY, THE PROCESS IS BASICALLY THE SAME EXCEPT THAT WE'RE NOT SEEKING FOR A UNIT PRICE BECAUSE SINCE IT IS A RENTAL SERVICE, IT'S NOT ONLY FOR THE UNIFORMS BUT ALSO FOR SHOP RAGS, THE FLOOR MATS.
WE'RE LOOKING FOR THEM TO PROVIDE US WITH A PROPOSAL OF WHAT THEIR OVERALL SERVICES WILL COVER AND THE PROPOSED COST.
>> YES, SIR. WE'RE JUST HOPING TO GET MORE COMPANIES INTERESTED IN IT. ALL RIGHT.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? NO, WE HAVE A MOTION IN SECOND FOR APPROVAL.
>> OPPOSED, HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES.
>> ITEM G NINE TO APPROVE CAPCOG INTER LOCAL AGREEMENT FOR 2024 AND 2025,
[G.9 To approve CAPCOG Interlocal Agreement for 2024-2025 Solid Waste Grant.]
SOLID WASTE GRANT. AMBER.>> ALL RIGHT. A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, WE APPLIED FOR THE SOLID WASTE GRANT FOR A TIRE COLLECTION EVENT AND WE ARE FINALLY GETTING OUR INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT THAT WE NEED TO APPROVE.
WE ARE GOING TO DO A TIRE-ONLY EVENT.
AS OF RIGHT NOW, WE'RE AIMING FOR MAY 11TH.
THAT WAS OUR PRIMARY DATE BECAUSE IT TOOK TCEQ SO LONG TO GET US THESE AGREEMENTS.
DEPENDING ON THE VENDORS, WE MAY HAVE TO PUSH IT A LITTLE.
I'M HOPING NOT BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO START GETTING A LITTLE HOT.
WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO STICK TO MAY 11TH, BUT THAT'S TO BE DETERMINED.
>> WE JUST NEED TO ACCEPT THE AGREEMENT AND WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GET EVERYTHING GOING.
>> OKAY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CAPCOG INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR 2024-2025 SOLID WASTE GRANT.
>> I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER HORN. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER THOMAS.
ANY DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS? NOT ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED. HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES.
[G.10 To ratify the approval of submitting a grant application for Caldwell County Constable Precinct 3 to the Texas Department of Transportation Traffic Safety - Operation Slow Down Grant.]
DISCUSSION ACTION TO RATIFY THE APPROVAL OF SUBMITTING A GRANT FOR CALDWELL COUNTY CONSPOL PRECINCT THREE TO THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC SAFETY ORGANIZATION SLOW-DOWN GRANT. AMBER.>> ALL RIGHT. WE WERE APPROACHED BY CONSTABLE PRECINCT 3 ABOUT THIS OPPORTUNITY.
WE'RE RATIFYING THE APPLICATION BECAUSE WE DIDN'T FIND OUT ABOUT IT UNTIL AFTER THE LAST COURT DATE AND THE DEADLINE WAS THAT WEEK.
WE ARE STILL IN THE REVIEW PERIOD, SO WE CAN PULL THE APPLICATION IF YOU'LL DECIDE THAT IT'S NOT A GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR US.
THIS IS BASICALLY JUST A REIMBURSEMENT GRANT.
HE'S OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT LIAISON WITH THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL POLICE ASSOCIATION AND HE CAN KIND OF GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF A RUNDOWN SUMMARY OF THE GRANT.
>> GOOD MORNING. THANKS FOR HAVING ME HERE.
PART OF WHAT I DO AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT LIAISON IS REACH OUT TO DIFFERENT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES WITHIN MY CONTACT AREA, THE AUSTIN DISTRICT, BEING ONE OF THEM.
WE ARE RIGHT NOW LOOKING TO RECRUIT AGENCIES IN AREAS WHERE WE HAVE KNOWN CRASH PROBLEMS, WHERE WE HAVE CRASH DATA SHOWING THAT WE HAVE CRASHES INVOLVING SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR DEATH.
WE TRY TO TARGET ENFORCEMENTS IN THOSE AREAS TO TRY TO SEE IF WE CAN REDUCE THOSE TYPES OF FATALITIES IN THOSE CRASH ZONES.
WE'VE REACHED OUT TO A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT AREAS AND OF COURSE, THESE GRANTS ARE THERE FOR AGENCIES THAT ARE INTERESTED IN THEM.
THE CONSTABLE PRECINCT 3 REACHED OUT AND WANTED TO LOOK MORE INTO THESE GRANTS.
NOW, THESE GRANTS ARE REIMBURSEMENT OVERTIME GRANTS, MEANING THAT ONCE THE OFFICERS OR THE DEPUTIES REACH OVERTIME STATUS, THAT'S WHEN THEY WOULD GO OUT AND THEN WORK IN THESE PARTICULAR CRASH AREAS TO STOP A VARIETY OF TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS.
NOW, THE GRANT THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE PARTICIPATING
[00:25:02]
IN IS THE OPERATION SLOW-DOWN GRANT, MEANING THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE FOCUSING EFFORTS ON PARTICULAR VIOLATIONS THAT INVOLVE SPEED.NOW, THAT DOESN'T JUST MEAN PEOPLE THAT ARE DRIVING OVER THE SPEED LIMIT, WHICH WE KNOW THAT IS A BIG ISSUE, BUT IT ALSO INVOLVES FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY, FAIL TO MAINTAIN SPEED.
THEY'RE GOING TO BE OUT THERE LOOKING FOR A VARIETY OF TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS.
NOW, THEY'RE NOT ONLY LOOKING FOR SPEED-RELATED STUFF, THEY CAN STOP FOR ANY VIOLATION THAT IS A DANGER TO THE PUBLIC OR THAT THAT DEPUTY OFFICER SEES FIT.
BUT WE DO TRY TO FOCUS THE NARRATIVE TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR TO GET THE IDEA IN THEIR HEAD THAT THEY NEED TO BE SLOWING DOWN, PAYING ATTENTION TO THESE LAWS, THAT SORT OF STUFF.
WHAT I DO AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT AS ON, IS I HELP THE AGENCIES NAVIGATE THE BUILDING OF THE GRANT.
I WORK WITH PEOPLE LIKE AMBER TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS WHAT'S INVOLVED WITH THE GRANT.
WE DON'T WANT TO GET ANY AGENCIES INVOLVED WITH THE GRANT THAT DON'T WANT TO BE INVOLVED.
OBVIOUSLY, THESE ARE GRANTS THAT ARE THERE TO ENSURE THAT WE CAN INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY OUT THERE.
WE'RE NOT LOOKING FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN THEY GO OUT AND WORK WHERE AND WHEN THEY SAY THEY'RE GOING TO WORK, AND THEN THEY REPORT BACK TO TXDOT WHAT THEY'VE DONE.
NOW, THIS IS A GRANT FROM THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION.
THIS IS FUNNELED DOWN FEDERALLY DOWN TO THE LOCAL OR THE STATE AREA OF TXDOT AND THAT'S WHERE I KIND OF COME INTO PLAY.
I DON'T WORK FOR TXDOT, BUT I ASSIST THEM IN KIND OF NAVIGATING SOME OF THIS GRANT STUFF.
I WORKED AS LAW ENFORCEMENT, SO I KNOW SOME OF THE TRAPS AND PITFALLS THAT COME WITH THAT.
AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME COME AND SPEAK.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WOULD LOVE TO MAYBE HELP ENLIGHTEN A LITTLE BIT.
>> COMMISSIONERS, WE HAD A DEADLINE ON THIS, SO IT'S BEEN SUBMITTED.
THIS IS ONLY TO RATIFY THE SUBMITTAL.
IF YOU CHOOSE TO PULL IT BACK, YOU CAN, BUT AT THIS POINT, WE'RE JUST LOOKING FOR A RATIFICATION OF THE SUBMITTAL OF THE GRANT.
>> YEAH. IF I COULD ADD TO THAT.
AT NO POINT OR IS ANYONE LOCKED INTO THIS GRANT.
EVEN ONCE WE'VE DONE THE MODIFICATIONS, THE ACTUAL GRANT ENFORCEMENT TIME IS JULY 19TH THROUGH THE 4TH OF AUGUST.
IT'S A VERY SHORT ENFORCEMENT.
BUT ANYWHERE UP LEADING TO THAT DAY, IF YOU DECIDE, YOU KNOW WHAT? THIS IS JUST NOT GOING TO BE SOMETHING WE WANT TO DO, THEN THERE'S ALWAYS THAT OPPORTUNITY.
COMMISSIONERS, LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF RATIFICATION?
>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION FOR RATIFICATION.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER THERIOT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WESTMORELAND. GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER.
>> THE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT THAT THIS GRANT WOULD REIMBURSE FOR WOULD BE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT OCCURRING ON TXDOT FACILITIES.
>> IT WOULD BE ENFORCEMENT THAT WAS INCURRED IN THE JURISDICTION OF WHATEVER AGENCY IS.
>> ANY ROADWAYS THAT THE CONSTABLE COUNTY PRECINCT 3 IS ALLOWED TO GOVERN, THAT'S OPEN TO BEING WORKED FOR THE GRANT.
>> IT'S JUST FOR TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT, NOT THE OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMPANY?
>> RIGHT. WHEN THEY'RE ON THE GRANT, THEY WOULD BE THEORETICALLY OFF OF THEIR REGULAR DUTY STUFF.
IN OVERTIME STATUS, THEY WOULD SIGN INTO THE GRANT, AND THEY WOULD STRICTLY BE THERE TO STOP VEHICLES.
>> ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NONE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED. HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU, SIR.
[G.11 To approve the release of fiscal deposit back to the developer of Hartland Ranch Phase 2 in the amount of $89,697.03.]
DISCUSSION ACTION TO APPROVE THE RELEASE OF FISCAL DEPOSIT BACK TO THE DEVELOPER OF HARTLAND RANCH, PHASE TWO IN THE AMOUNT OF $89,697.03.COMMISSIONER WESTMORELAND, OR DONALD.
>> DONALD, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD OR?
>> OKAY. DONALD SAYS WE'RE READY TO RELEASE.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE RELEASE OF THE FISCAL BACK TO HARTLAND RANCH PHASE 2?
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WESTMORELAND. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HORN.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NOT. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED? HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES. ITEM G12.
[G.12 To approve fiscal security for construction with a bond in the amount of $719,418.15 for Tumbleweed Estates Phase 3, LLC located at 2302 Tumbleweed Trail.]
DISCUSSION ACTION TO APPROVE THE FISCAL SECURITY FOR CONSTRUCTION WITH A BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $719,418.15 FOR TUMBLEWEED ESTATES PHASE 3, LLC LOCATED AT 2302 TUMBLEWEED TRAIL.COMMISSIONER THOMAS OR DONALD.
COME ON UP, DONALD, SO WE CAN HEAR YOU.
>> THE BOND HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND THEY'RE READY TO START WORK.
>> ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE
[00:30:02]
THE FISCAL SECURITY FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR TUMBLEWEED ESTATES PHASE 3?>> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER THOMAS. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
>> WE HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HORN.
ANY DISCUSSION? NOT. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED? HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES.
ITEM G13, DISCUSSION ACTION TO APPROVE
[G.13 To approve a request for Lytton Hills, Phase 1 subdivision for a 1-year extension per Section 4.1.E of the Caldwell County Development Ordinance.]
A REQUEST FOR LITTON HILLS PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION PER SECTION 4.1 POINT (E) OF CALDWELL COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE.WHO WANTS TO SPEAK TO THAT ONE.
>> SO MOSTLY HERE, IF YOU ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
BACKGROUND OF THAT IS WE WERE REVIEWING THEIR PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION PLANS, REALIZED THEY WERE STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE 1, AND THAT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EXPIRES, I BELIEVE IT'S IN MY LETTER, I THINK JUNE OR JULY OF THIS YEAR, IS REALLY BORDERLINE WHEN THEY'RE GOING TO GET FINISHED.
NOTHING HAS CHANGED IN OUR REGULATIONS THAT WOULD CAUSE US TO REEVALUATE THEIR PLANS AND WE'RE TO RE-PERMIT THEM.
THEY'VE ASKED FOR A ONE YEAR EXTENSION, WHICH IS AUTHORIZED UNDER THE ORDINANCE.
>> VERY GOOD. COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUESTS FOR LITTON HILLS, PHASE 1 FOR A ONE YEAR EXTENSION?
>> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER THOMAS. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
>> A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WESTMORELAND.
ANY DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS? NOT. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OPPOSED? HEARING NONE, MOTION CARRIES.
WE'LL MOVE TO DISCUSSION ONLY ITEMS NOW.
[H.1 To discuss Caldwell County policy surrounding celebratory and unauthorized gunfire on platted subdivisions.]
ITEM H1.DISCUSSION CALDWELL COUNTY POLICIES SURROUNDING CELEBRATORY AND UNAUTHORIZED GUNFIRE ON PLATTED SUBDIVISIONS.
I'M BRINGING UP THE ISSUE OF CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE FOR THE COURT TO DISCUSS BECAUSE THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT IS BROUGHT UP TIME AND AGAIN BY PRECINCT 4 CONSTITUENTS TO ME AND TO CONSTABLE [INAUDIBLE] THIS IS A DEADLY PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUE AROUND THE ESTATE WITH SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES, ESPECIALLY AROUND THE 4TH OF JULY AND CHRISTMAS, NEW YEAR'S EVE.
HAYS COUNTY, A SEVEN YEAR OLD DOWN.
DANIEL GALATIA IS KILLED BY STRAY BULLETS IN HAYS COUNTY.
ANOTHER COUNTY THAT'S CLOSE TO US IS NEW YEAR'S EVE 2024.
A MAN WAS STRUCK BY CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE IN BASTROP COUNTY.
WE KNOW THAT THIS IS AN ISSUE AFFECTING SEVERAL PARTS OF OUR COUNTY AND EXTENDED BEYOND JUST THE MAJOR HOLIDAYS.
WHAT WE HAVE DISCOVERED IS WHAT GOES UP MUST COME DOWN.
I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE A DISCUSSION AROUND THREE THINGS. ACREAGE RULE.
IN 2028, THE COURT PASSED AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING GUN FIRE ON PLATTED SUBDIVISIONS IN THE COUNTY AT 2.1 ACRES. IS THAT ENOUGH? FOR INSTANCE, BASTROP COUNTY RESTRICT GUN FIRE UP TO FIVE ACRES.
COULD WE BRING DOING A BETTER JOB WHEN IT COMES TO COMMUNICATING THE CONSEQUENCES OF LAWS BROKEN IN THE ACT OF CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE? FOR EXAMPLE, PSAS ON SOCIAL MEDIA, SIGNS, AND VIDEO CAMPAIGNS.
ENFORCEMENT. COULD THE COUNTY DO ANYTHING TO INCREASE ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAWS BROKEN IN THE ACT OF CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE? THESE ARE SOME OF THE THREE ISSUES THAT I'M INTRODUCING TO THE COURT TODAY.
BACKGROUND. AS YOU SEE THE CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE IT'S A DEADLY STATEWIDE ISSUE IN TEXAS.
CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT PASSED AN ORDINANCE IN 2018 RESTRICTING GUN FIRE ON PLATTED SUBDIVISIONS, PARTIALS 2.1 ACRES OR SMALLER.
THE COUNTY AUTHORIZED THE STATE BY RESTRICTING GUN FIRE ON PLATTED TO POTENTIALLY REDUCE CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE, REMINDING THE PUBLIC OF POTENTIAL DEADLY CONSEQUENCES AND FACTS THAT IT'S ALREADY ILLEGAL IN MOST STATES.
TODAY I PRESENT TO YOU CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE THAT WHAT GOES UP MUST COME DOWN.
CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE THAT'S DANGEROUS KILLS PEOPLE.
WHY IS IT SO DANGEROUS IN GREAT HEIGHTS, BEFORE IT FALLS.
SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING BY GREAT HEIGHTS, THE HIGHER THE BULLET GOES, AND ONCE IT COMES DOWN, THE DANGEROUS THE FALL. NEXT SLIDE.
SO AS THIS SCREEN IS SHOWING TWO ACRES,
[00:35:03]
YES, THAT IS THE COURTHOUSE.SO THAT'S THE TWO ACRES RADIUS AS COMPARED TO THE 10 ACRE RADIUS.
SO IF THAT'S 10 ACRES COMPARED TO THE TWO ACRES, YOU HAVE A WIDE VARIETY OF ACRES IN A PLATTED SUBDIVISION.
SO THIS IS HARRIS COUNTY, ONE OF THE PSAS.
THIS IS JUST ABOUT COMMITTING CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE MAKING SCIENCE AND DAILY CONDUCT CLASS MISDEMEANOR PUBLISHED.
THIS IS THE PRESENTATION WHERE I'M ASKING THE COURT TO HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSION AND A MORE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DURING THE CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE.
I HAVE ALSO COMMISSIONER TERRIO AND MYSELF TO WORK FURTHER WITH THIS AND BRING SOME MORE INFORMATION TO THE COURT.
>> THAT'D BE GREAT. WE CAN'T VOTE ON IT TODAY, BUT WE CAN DISCUSS, ESPECIALLY THOSE THREE ITEMS THAT YOU BROUGHT FORTH.
I THINK I 100% AGREE THAT SOME PSAS AND SOME PUBLIC OUTREACH WOULD BE HELPFUL FOR US TO DO, AND I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT MILES COULD HELP WITH AS OUR PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER.
THE ACREAGE RULE, I REMEMBER WHEN THAT WAS DONE.
I WAS OFF THE COURT AT THAT TIME, RUNNING FOR THIS OFFICE.
I HAD BEEN COMMISSIONER PRIOR TO THAT.
THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSION.
SOME OF IT WAS AROUND, ARE WE VIOLATING PEOPLE'S SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY RESTRICTING THE ACREAGES.
I THINK THAT WAS DETERMINED TO BE NOT THE CASE.
YOU CAN STILL BEAR ARMS. YOU CAN STILL PROTECT YOUR HOUSEHOLD.
SO IN THE SECOND AMENDMENTS, AS WE ALL KNOW, IS VERY SHORT, LIKE ONE SENTENCE.
AND THIS DOES NOT RESTRICT YOUR ABILITY TO BEAR ARMS OR PROTECT YOURSELF.
MY ONLY CONCERN WITH THIS IS MORE AROUND ENFORCEMENT.
I'D BE CURIOUS TO KNOW HOW MANY PLATTED 10 ACRE LOTS WE HAVE CURRENTLY THAT WE'RE GOING TO ADD TO THE SUBDIVISIONS BECAUSE WE'RE HAVING A DIFFICULT TIME ENFORCING IT IN THE SUBDIVISIONS THAT QUALIFY UNDER THE 2.1 ACRES AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS UNLESS ONE OF OUR OFFICERS SEES THE CELEBRATORY GUNFIRE IN THE ACT, WE CANNOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.
THEY CAN'T. THEY CAN GO OVER THERE AND SAY SOMEBODY COMPLAINED, IF YOU'RE DOING IT, STOP.
THAT'S ABOUT THE EXTENT OF WHAT THEY CAN DO.
SO THEY LITERALLY HAVE TO SEE THEM DOING IT, AND WHAT HAPPENS IS EVERYBODY DOES IT AND THEN THEY GO IN THE HOUSE WHEN THE POLICE SHOW UP.
THAT'S REALLY ALL I HAVE TO SAY AROUND THE ACREAGE RULE AND ENFORCEMENT.
COMMISSIONERS, IF Y'ALL HAVE SOMETHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD, THIS IS THE TIME TO DO IT.
BUT I THINK WE CAN DO MORE WITHOUT A DOUBT TO EDUCATE AND TO TRY TO CURTAIL SOME OF THIS.
I'M JUST A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT HOW WE ENFORCE IT.
>> BUT WITH THE PSAS, WE CAN WORK ON THAT, FURTHER EDUCATE EACH SUBDIVISION.
>> SURE. AND WE CAN BRING IT TO COURT AND GET INTO IT AS A DISCUSSION ACTION ITEM AT SOME POINT.
COMMISSIONER TERRIO, DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING YOU WANTED TO SAY?
ENFORCEMENT HAS ALWAYS BEEN AND PROBABLY WILL BE A PROBLEM.
I RECALL DURING THE PREVIOUS DISCUSSION WHERE WE ENDED UP AT 2.1 ACRES.
THERE WERE THE CONCERNS COMING OUT THAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT ON MAKING SURE WE WEREN'T INFRINGING ON ANYONE'S RIGHT RELATED TO FIREARMS. AS A RESULT OF THAT DISCUSSION, WE BUILT A LOT OF SAFEGUARDS INTO IT TO PROTECT THOSE RIGHTS AND THOSE INCLUDED SHOOTING.
EVEN IF YOU WERE LESS THAN TWO ACRES SHOOTING AGAINST A, I DON'T REMEMBER THE EXACT WORD, BUT A BERM CONSTRUCTED FOR THAT PURPOSE, OR PROTECTING YOUR PROPERTY SUCH AS SHOOTING SNAKES OR WHATEVER.
SO THOSE PROTECTIONS ARE IN THERE.
JUST FROM A PRACTICAL STANDPOINT, IT WOULD BE INTERESTING TO KNOW IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY SUCCESSFUL ENFORCEMENT RELATED TO IT.
[00:40:02]
MAYBE WE COULD GET THAT INFORMATION FOR NEXT MEETING.BUT WE HAVE LOTS OF THREE ACRE, FIVE ACRE SUBDIVISIONS, A WHOLE LOT OF FIVE ACRE THAT INCREASING THE AMOUNT, WHATEVER THAT AMOUNT NEEDED TO BE, MIGHT AT LEAST, THROUGH OUR EDUCATION, WE CAN LET PEOPLE KNOW THAT THESE RULES ARE IN PLACE WHETHER WE'RE ABLE TO ENFORCE IT OR NOT.
>> I'M EVEN OKAY GOING UP TO 10 ACRES.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT NUMBER 1, WE HAVE A PLAN FOR ENFORCEMENT AND THAT WOULD PROBABLY INVOLVE HAVING SOME CONVERSATIONS WITH OUR SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND CONSTABLES OFFICES.
BECAUSE IT'S NOT JUST A PRECINCT 4 ISSUE.
IT SEEMS TO BE WORSE THAN PRECINCT 4 WITHOUT A DOUBT, BUT IT GOES ON EVERYWHERE. I'M OKAY. I'M NOT OPPOSED TO INCREASING IT.
I JUST THINK THAT IF WE INCREASED IT, THEN WE NEED BE IN A POSITION TO DO A SERIOUS PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN PRIOR TO IT SO THAT PEOPLE, NUMBER 1, KNOW IT'S COMING, HAVE A CHANCE TO COME TO COURT AND WEIGH IN ON IT BECAUSE WE NEED TO HEAR FROM PEOPLE.
A MATTER OF FACT, I'M A LITTLE SURPRISED NOBODY IS HERE TODAY BECAUSE WHEN THIS CAME UP FOR DISCUSSION THE FIRST TIME THEY WERE OUT THE DOOR AND DOWN THE STAIRWELL FOR CITIZENS COMMENTS.
I FULLY EXPECTED THAT TODAY, SO I WAS A LITTLE SURPRISED THAT NOBODY CAME.
WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT DURING OUR PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS THAT WE TELL THEM THAT THIS IS AN ISSUE WE'RE GOING TO TAKE UP AND GIVE THEM A CHANCE TO COME IN AND WEIGH IN ON IT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. THAT CAN BE DONE.
>> BE MORE THAN WILLING TO ENTERTAIN DEFINITELY LOOKING AT THE ACREAGE REQUIREMENT THAT WAS ALMOST SIX YEARS AGO AT THIS POINT.
I REMEMBER IT BEING A VERY ROBUST DISCUSSION THOUGH.
I THINK THE PUBLIC COMMUNICATION ASPECT IS VERY IMPORTANT.
I'D LOVE TO SEE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ON HOW WE WOULD ROLL THAT OUT, AND I'D HAVE NO PROBLEM BEING IN SUPPORT OF THAT AS WELL.
BUT I DO THINK THE TESTIMONY ON ENFORCEMENT FROM OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS HERE IN THE COUNTY WOULD ALSO BE BENEFICIAL TO UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHAT THEIR LIMITATIONS ARE FROM THEM.
I'D BE MORE THAN WILLING TO SEE WHERE WE CAN LAY GOING FORWARD.
>> I DO KNOW AND I WANT TO GIVE CONSTABLE VIA REAL AND HIS CREW AND THE SO CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.
WE DID DO AND SOME OF THESE SUBDIVISIONS WHERE THERE'S 2.1 ACRES OR LESS PRETTY ROBUST PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN WHERE WE EVEN CENTER WENT DOOR TO DOOR WITH FLYERS WITH BILINGUAL SPEAKERS, HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH PEOPLE IF THEY CAME TO THE DOOR ABOUT WE'RE GOING TO START THIS IS GOING TO BE ENFORCED, YOU'RE GOING TO START SEEING THIS MORE, AND IT DIED DOWN A LITTLE BIT.
BUT NOW IT SEEMS TO BE COMING BACK.
>> JUDGE, WE'RE WORKING ON THAT AGAIN.
>> BUT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS GETTING LARGER PSAS AND PUTTING THEM AT THE SUBDIVISION AND THEN GOING IN.
>> SURE. WE COULD DO A SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN IN ENGLISH AND SPANISH AND DO SOME OUTREACH.
BUT I JUST THINK WE NEED TO GIVE THE CITIZENS A CHANCE TO COME IN AND WEIGH IN BEFORE WE TAKE ANY ACTION.
I THINK WE NEED TO PROBABLY HAVE THIS BACK ON THE AGENDA FOR MORE DISCUSSION SO THAT WE CAN DISCUSS, COME IN WITH SOME SPECIFIC IDEAS ABOUT WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO AROUND PSAS, WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO AROUND ENFORCEMENT, WHAT OUR PLANS ARE SO THAT WHEN PEOPLE COME IN FOR CITIZENS COMMENTS, THEY THEY KNOW WHAT WE'RE PLANNING TO DO BEFORE THEY SPEAK SO THAT WE CAN NARROW THAT CONVERSATION DOWN A LITTLE BIT.
ANYTHING ELSE, COMMISSIONERS? THANKS FOR BRINGING THAT FORWARD, COMMISSIONER THOMAS, WE APPRECIATE IT.
IT'S PROBABLY TIME TO DEFINITELY REVISIT THAT AGAIN.
WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE TO DISCUSSION ITEM H2 TO DISCUSS THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SUNSET OAKS,
[H.2 To discuss the development agreement for Sunset Oaks IX (9) located off FM 1984.]
NINE LOCATED OFF FM 1984.>> THE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE DEVELOPER HERE, THEY'LL MAKE A LITTLE PRESENTATION.
I'VE GOT SOME MAPS. THEY HAVE TO PLAY VANNA WHITE HOLDING THEM UP.
THEY'RE FULL SIZE PLOTS, COUPLE OF THINGS.
THIS PROBABLY WON'T END UP NAME SUNSET NINE BY THE TIME IT'S FINISHED.
[00:45:06]
IT IS BY THE SAME DEVELOPER AS SUNSET OAKS AND IT'S IN PROXIMATE VICINITY, BUT IT'S NOT ACTUALLY ATTACHED TO SUNSET OAKS.THE DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY AND STYLE IS PROPOSED TO FOLLOW THE SAME CONCEPTS AS SUNSET OAKS THOUGH.
LET THEIR TEAM COME UP HERE AND PRESENT THEIR PRESENTATION.
THIS IS VANNA WHITE THAT YOU MENTIONED, BUT MY NAME IS BEN GREEN.
I'M WITH KENLEY HORN, WE'RE THE ENGINEER REPRESENTING THE DEVELOPER.
WE PLACED TWO LAND PLANS UP THERE IN FRONT AND THEN CHANDLERS HOLDING ONE UP.
AS TRACY MENTIONED, THIS WILL BE ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT PRODUCED BY THE WHAT WE'RE CALLING RFGAO DEVELOPMENT.
THEY WILL BE SITE BUILT SUBDIVISIONS.
WHERE YOU ARE PROPOSING 40 FOOT LOTS AND 60 FOOT LOTS.
I BELIEVE THE MIX WILL BE 80% 40 AND 20% 60 FOOT.
WATER SERVED BY MAXWELL WATER, WASTEWATER, AQUA, TEXAS, DETENTION PROVIDED ON SITE.
THERE WILL BE A SMALL COMMERCIAL COMPONENT OFF OF 1984.
LET'S SEE IF YOU HOLD THAT UP. WE ARE PROPOSING SOME PARKLAND WITH THE DEVELOPMENT, I BELIEVE, 5% OF THE TOTAL CROSS AREA WILL BE DEDICATED OPEN SPACE SLASH PARKLAND.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> TRACY MENTIONED THE NAME CHANGE AND THAT'S SOMETHING WE'LL BE LOOKING FOR.
ON THE PARKLAND DEDICATION AND MAYBE I'M JUST MISSING IT, BUT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THE AGREEMENT PROVIDES FOR THE OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF THOSE FACILITIES.
>> GREAT POINT. THE HOA WILL MAINTAIN ALL OPEN SPACE PARKLAND DRAINAGE.
I BELIEVE EVEN SIDEWALKS AND STORM INFRASTRUCTURE.
I THINK THE COUNTY IS ONLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ROADWAY.
IS HOW WE'VE BEEN PRODUCING THESE DEVELOPMENTS.
>> DOES THE ORDINANCE PROVIDE FOR THE FACILITIES WITHIN THAT PARKLAND?
>> THAT'S SOMETHING WE CAN DISCUSS.
IN PAST DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, WE'VE WORKED WITH YOU ALL, WE'VE SPECIFIED CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS THAT YOU MADE.
WE DO ANTICIPATE AT MANY CENTER.
HOWEVER WE WANT TO WORD THAT WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WE'LL WE'LL DEFINITELY WORK WITH YOU.
>> ALL I WANT TO LIST OF THOSE FACILITIES AND WHERE THEY MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT.
>> I KNOW ON THE PREVIOUS ONE WE DID, WE ALSO SPECIFIED PLAY SCAPES IN EACH OF THE PARKS AND STUFF LIKE THAT, WHICH WE CAN, AGAIN, DISCUSS.
>> THEN THE ACCESS, I GUESS I'D BE ACCESS TO THE NORTHWEST INTERCONNECTING INTO THE PLAN SUBDIVISIONS IN THAT AREA.
Y'ALL ARE COORDINATING WITH TRACY ON THAT?
>> WE DID. THIS WAS AN OLDER PLAN.
WE HAD A MEETING WITH ED AND TRACY A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO BEFORE THIS.
ONE THING THAT WAS MENTIONED IS PROVIDE A FEW ADDITIONAL STUB OUTS TO THE NEIGHBORING UNDEVELOPED TRACK, WHICH WE WILL DO.
I THINK WE ONLY SHOW ONE CURRENTLY, BUT WE'RE PLAN AT AS MAYBE THREE THAT WOULD CONNECT AND ALLOW THEM TO DEVELOP IN THE FUTURE AND ACCESS 1984.
>> THEN WILL THERE BE A TIA ON THIS PROJECT?
>> THAT'LL BE SUBMITTED TO TEXTER ARE THEY PART OF THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THAT? I'M JUST THINKING OF THE ENTRANCE ON THE 1988.
>> I THINK THAT'D BE IMPORTANT.
>> THAT'S MAINTAINED BY TEXTER.
>> SOMETIMES THEY'LL REQUIRE DSL LANE OR A LEFT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT TO BE CONSTRUCTED.
>> DEFINITELY ARE ANTICIPATED TIA TO AT LEAST GO THE COUNTY, BUT POSSIBLY TEXTER IT IF THEY ALSO HAVE REVIEW AUTHORITY.
YES, THAT WILL DETERMINE ANY OF THE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS WE MIGHT NEED DESEL LANES, TURN LANES, WHATEVER THAT MIGHT LOOK LIKE.
>> THEN MY LAST ONE WAS YOU'RE TYING INTO APA FOR WASTEWATER AND DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEIR TREATMENT LEVEL IS?
>> IT'S A REALLY GOOD QUESTION. I KNOW IT'S AN EXISTING PLANT.
IT'S THE HEN FILL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT THAT'S ACTUALLY WITHIN SUNSET OAKS 6 JUST NORTHWEST OF HERE.
I CAN'T SEE IT ON THIS MAP, BUT ROUGHLY IN THIS AREA? IT'S SERVING SUNSET 5, SUNSET 6, AND THE NEW COTTON GATEWAY PROJECT.
I KNOW RECENTLY THE COUNTY HAS ADOPTED A HIGHER STANDARD FOR TREATMENT PLANT.
I THINK WE'RE TRYING TO GET SOME OF THE PREVIOUS APPROVALS WERE AT 0.1 OR ONE AND WE WERE TRYING TO GET TO 0.5 ON ALL OF THESE.
[00:50:05]
I DON'T KNOW THEIR EXISTING TREATMENT LEVEL THOUGH.>> WE ACTUALLY WEREN'T THE ENGINEER ON THAT TREATMENT PLANT, BUT I CAN GATHER THAT INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE TO THE COUNTY JUST FOR OUR KNOWLEDGE.
I KNOW THE PERMITS BEEN ACCEPTED.
I THINK THEY'RE ABOUT TO START CONSTRUCTION ON THE PLANT, BUT SOMETHING WE CAN DEFINITELY BE OPEN AND DISCUSS AND CONVEY TO YOU WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING AT.
>> THAT'D BE GOOD. PROSPEROUS HAS A TENDENCY TO HANG AROUND AND THE OTHERS BREAKDOWN.
THAT'S ALL I GOT. GO. YOU ASKED MINE SO STOLE MY THUNDER.
[LAUGHTER] ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
>> NO. COMMISSIONER TARIO COVERED ALL MINE.
>> I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU.
>> WITH THAT, WE'VE COME TO ITEM I.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN?
>> WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
>> WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND.
>> OPPOSED HEARING NONE. WE ARE ADJOURNED AT 9:51.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.